
by Gregory F. Treverton, M. Elaine Bunn, David C. Gompert
Many observers have noted that past formulations of American militarystrategy, such as the Shape, Respond, Prepare Now approach that theDepartment of Defense used from 1997 until 2001, have been longer onphilosophy than on practicalities. To address those shortcomings, thisreport outlines a preliminary framework designed to better link strategywith resource priorities and more accurately frame key investment choices. This report contains the results of a study designed to assist theDepartment of Defense in its efforts to refine the defense strategy in lightof recent experiences and to address expectations about future challenges toU. S. national security. The framework model presented in this reportprovides a space in which decisionmakers can display strategic options andtheir inherent tradeoffs, debate the merits of those competing choices, andthen decide on a specific strategy.
No reviews yet — be the first to write one from the Log screen.
No quotes yet.
Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 and oversight of previously authorized programs before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services2013
Report of the Controller and Auditor-General, Tumuaki o te Mana Arotake
New Zealand. Audit Office.1999