Settled Versus Right
United states, supreme courtStare decisisConstitutional law, united statesDecision makingConstitutional law
0.0
Open LibraryAbout this book
"[This book] develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. [The author] contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go."--
Themes & subjects
United states, supreme courtStare decisisConstitutional law, united statesDecision makingConstitutional lawUnited States. Supreme Court
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to write one from the Log screen.
Quotes
No quotes yet.
